• Home
  • Categories
    • Brand Research
    • Consumer Electronics
    • Effects of Recession
    • Green Technology
    • Marketing to Women
    • Technology Branding
  • Subscribe via RSS

Toiling Over Choosing a Name

July 17th, 2009  |  Published in Technology Branding  |  2 Comments

hello-my-name-is_m

One of the most subjective processes in launching a new company/product is choosing a name. One that encapsulates the brand promise, product portfolio, personality, values, etc. and accelerates the company/product to an increased state of value.

Before proceeding down this often treacherous path, take a common-day example to heart. Think of the last time you chose a name for your pet or child. What was the process you went through?

Perhaps:

  1. Competitive Assessment - Investigating names in your neighborhood/family tree. Talking with people about their naming process, why they chose the name they did and what it means to them.
  2. Brand Platform - Finding the “platform” that the name accentuates. How similar or dissimilar do you want the name to be? Based on religion? Nostalgia? Uniqueness? Status?
  3. Target Forecasting - Visualizing how that name might effect their acceptance in society. Will it make them seem academic? Popular? An outcast? Or perhaps it’s so unique it will make them special/coveted?
  4. Constructing Identification -  After analyzing (or perhaps over-analyzing), one may think - does the name really matter? Won’t a strong identity and personality surround the name and create its own context? Just as celebrities craft their equity - the word Madonna once known as a the “Mother of Jesus,” now is seen as a recording artist, actress and entrepreneur.
  5. Proving Acceptance - With this acknowledgement, one may realize that they can’t secure the fate of their new name. But what they can control are the efforts to bring education, depth and authenticity to that name - allowing it to convey the personality in a way that’s memorable and individual.

The naming process is challenging and charged with opinions. It could be developed by the best naming agency with 6-12 months of testing - similar to Bing - and still be seen as a “me-too” proposition or it could be cherished and adopted into society lexicon - Google, Kleenex, Tivo, etc. One must focus more on what is supporting the name as proof to the value promise, than believe that the name will do that itself.

Because at the end of the day, a Stephen can still make a choice of being a Baldwin or a Hawking.

Responses

Feed Trackback Address
  1. ujezyfon says:

    August 24th, 2009 at 5:16 pm (#)

    ujezyfon…

    playscary barney maze …

  2. inovupihe says:

    September 25th, 2009 at 7:28 am (#)

    inovupihe…

    del monte kitchenomics recipes …

Leave a Response

Background

  • Remy Allis Background

Recent Posts

  • New Research on 2009 B2B Marketing Strategies
  • Toiling Over Choosing a Name
  • Evolving Vernacular List for 2010
  • The Power of a (Brand) Image
  • 10 Worst Innovation Mistakes In A Recession
  • A.P.I.M.: A Practice in Meaning (aka KISS)
  • The Expensive New Agency Model
  • The Magic of Connecting Subcultures
  • Della To Capture Female Netbooker
  • Reflecting on Redefined Consumer Sensibilities

10 worst mistakes that quell innovation:

10 Fire talent.
9 Cut back on technology.
8 Reduce Risk. Give into the instinct to be conservative.
7 Stop new product development.
6 Replace growth-oriented CEOs with cost-cutting CEOs.
5 Retreat from globalization.
4 Replace innovation as key strategy.
3 Change performance metrics.
2 Reinforce hierarchy over collaboration.
1 Only look internally for change.
Welcome to Allis Inc.

Archives

  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

Categories

  • Brand Research
  • Consumer Electronics
  • Effects of Recession
  • Green Technology
  • Marketing to Women
  • Technology Branding
Subscribe


©2010
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.